{"id":18184,"date":"2003-12-02T13:31:47","date_gmt":"2003-12-02T13:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/archives\/2003\/12\/02\/regarding-last-weeks-quote-on-usability-usability-without-innovation-represents-failure"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T06:00:00","slug":"regarding-last-weeks-quote-on-usability-usability-without-innovation-represents-failure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/archives\/2003\/12\/02\/regarding-last-weeks-quote-on-usability-usability-without-innovation-represents-failure","title":{"rendered":"Regarding last week&#8217;s quote on usability &#8212;   &#8220;Usability without innovation represents failure."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Tue Dec  2 13:31:47 PST 2003 --><\/p>\n<p>\nRegarding <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dsandler.org\/entry.php?2350\">last week&#8217;s<br \/>\nquote on usability<\/a> &mdash;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote class=quote><p>\n&ldquo;Usability without innovation represents failure. Innovation without<br \/>\nusability merely means we aren&#8217;t done yet.&rdquo;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\n&mdash; <a href=\"http:\/\/livejournal.com\/users\/ctate\/\">ctate<\/a> retorts,\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div class=irc>\n<p><span class=\"irc-nick\">&lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/ctate\">ctate<\/a>&gt;<\/span> i disagree rather firmly with the first half  <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"irc-nick\">&lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plover.net\/~ctate\/\">ctate<\/a>&gt;<\/span> usability is success, full stop. <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"irc-nick\">&lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/ctate\">ctate<\/a>&gt;<\/span> whether it&#8217;s innovative is beside the point. <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"irc-nick\">&lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plover.net\/~ctate\/\">ctate<\/a>&gt;<\/span> usability without IMPROVEMENT is a lateral move, and so not as good as usability + improvment; but i don&#8217;t like &#8220;innovative&#8221; here; it&#8217;s<br \/>\n  too connotative of quantum leaps rather than evolutionary progression.\n  <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\nI&#8217;m with ya.  Case in point: iTunes.  Not really a technological leap<br \/>\nover WinAmp (well, the charred remains of WinAmp) or MusicMatch CrapBox,<br \/>\nbut a huge boost in usability results in an overall win.  iTunes doesn&#8217;t<br \/>\npush the audio-playback envelope, but it can definitely be considered<br \/>\nwinnage.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThen again, if the source of the <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/djslim.com\/lmnt\/geek\/diary\/?entry=106789963061816974&#038;archive=2003_11_01_.geek.log.xml&#038;section=geek\">original<br \/>\nquote<\/a> was talking about some sort of research project where<br \/>\nusability is explicitly disclaimed as being an important success<br \/>\ncriterion, well, perhaps the quote holds water.  But I wouldn&#8217;t want to<br \/>\nwork on <em>that<\/em> project.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Regarding last week&#8217;s quote on usability &mdash; &ldquo;Usability without innovation represents failure. Innovation without usability merely means we aren&#8217;t done yet.&rdquo; &mdash; ctate retorts, &lt;ctate&gt; i disagree rather firmly with the first half &lt;ctate&gt; usability is success, full stop. &lt;ctate&gt; whether it&#8217;s innovative is beside the point. &lt;ctate&gt; usability without IMPROVEMENT is a lateral move, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notebook"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18184\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}