{"id":17036,"date":"2004-11-18T08:25:13","date_gmt":"2004-11-18T08:25:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/archives\/2004\/11\/18\/obligatory-rss-advertising-post"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T06:00:00","slug":"obligatory-rss-advertising-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/archives\/2004\/11\/18\/obligatory-rss-advertising-post","title":{"rendered":"Obligatory RSS advertising post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Thu Nov 18 08:25:13 PST 2004 --><br \/>\n<!-- T: \"Obligatory RSS advertising post\" --><\/p>\n<p>\nBetter mention the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/ebiz\/0,1272,65745,00.html\">Wired article on RSS advertising<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.37signals.com\/svn\/archives\/000930.php?97\">Signal vs. Noise thread<\/a> about it too.  Despite the abundant pithy disgust response (&#8220;Unsubscribed.&#8221;), I don&rsquo;t think this is necessarily a bad thing.  RSS items are marshallable, mungeable things.  If a user doesn&rsquo;t want to read an ad, she doesn&rsquo;t have to click the RSS item.  Software can be written to sift ads from content if you&rsquo;re really upset, but honestly, what&rsquo;s wrong with targeted text-based ads?  <\/p>\n<p>\nData point: Google&rsquo;s PageAds don&rsquo;t bother me at all.  They don&rsquo;t blink, don&rsquo;t jump around, and I can choose to look at them or not without a whole lot of hassle.  They&rsquo;re unobtrusive, and therefore I&rsquo;m less likely to shut them all down. And so now what we have are textual advertisements in a structured medium&mdash;perfect for this kind of take-it-or-leave-it user scenario.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nLook at it this way.  If the RSS ad keeps your favorite feed running, but doesn&rsquo;t obscure the content or cause an epileptic seizure, <em>be thankful.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\nAnother possible way to support RSS feeds: headlines are free, but you can pay a few bucks a year for full-article service, audioblogs, images, etc.  <em>That<\/em> sounds like a winning proposition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Better mention the Wired article on RSS advertising and the Signal vs. Noise thread about it too. Despite the abundant pithy disgust response (&#8220;Unsubscribed.&#8221;), I don&rsquo;t think this is necessarily a bad thing. RSS items are marshallable, mungeable things. If a user doesn&rsquo;t want to read an ad, she doesn&rsquo;t have to click the RSS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notebook"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dsandler.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}