dsandler.org

Cultural concurrency.

October 9th, 2007

So, In Rainbows comes out tonight. You might have heard or read about it.

This release will clearly be watched closely by those interested in the moribund business of music and how it just might become evolved instead of exctinct. In this particular experiment, the hypothesis under test is this: can bagel-man economics really work in the mass market? (Indeed, Levitt and Dubner are curious too.) Very, very exciting times.

But that’s not what I want to discuss at the moment. I’d like to proffer the following: This will be the most simultaneously-experienced music release in history.

Assuming their server holds up, millions (seriously, millions) of listeners—comprising diehard fans as well as the merely curious—will be experiencing In Rainbows at the same time. This shared-experience aspect to a major album release is nothing new, and I’ve bought a handful of albums on opening day (or at midnight the night before, in a couple of cases) myself. What makes this different is the scale, along three axes:

  1. Space. This album will be available everywhere, not just at your neighborhood $18-a-hit corner dealer.
  2. Time. No waiting for stores to open in your timezone; the Radioheadspace will be simultaneous around the globe.
  3. Cost. I buy (and therefore get to listen to) about 5% of the music I’m really interested in because I have to budget my luxuries. Even more so for college and high school students, the most ravenous consumers of popular music. They will all be able to afford this album.

I get the impression that, more than anything, bands are looking to connect more directly with their (current and future) fans, and to do so, they are seeking ways to become label-independent. There may or may not be a financial motive; it’s impossible to say whether, absent a middleman, artists will see more or less revenue from album sales, especially if you’re just holding out the donation box. But because the real money is in touring, and only fans go to shows, any investment—even a loss-leader, such as simply giving an album away (e.g., Prince)—in eventual ticket sales is a smart one.

But here I am getting back into economics (a favorite armchair science of many). I think the real reason to open a new socket to listeners—and the reason this cheap-as-free download phenomenon (see also: news from NIN) isn’t just a gimmick or a fad—is that they will start listening again.

All at once, in this case.

5 responses

  1. ctate  

    download download.

    you do realize that i just learned about the Radiohead voluntary-contribution album download from this post, right?

    awesomeness.

    comment posted at 12:24 am on 10 Oct 2007

  2. dsandler  

    Update: inrainbows.com was up last night, but is crippled this morning. I suspect that the CDN they’ve set up to distribute the album itself is fine, but that the “ecommerce” (do we still call it that?) site is unable to handle the load.

    Actually, when I was purchasing last night, there were already signs of strain: many images, including the CAPTCHA, were corrupted in transit and needed to be reloaded a few times to get it right. By contrast, the zipfile downloaded quickly and painlessly.

    (Edit: Found someone else who had trouble seeing the CAPTCHA.)

    comment posted at 8:26 am on 10 Oct 2007

  3. dsandler  

    Uh oh for Thom. Busted online store = no luv from bloggers.

    comment posted at 9:03 am on 10 Oct 2007

  4. dsandler  

    Telegraph: Oasis, Jamiroquai to follow Radiohead.

    comment posted at 9:14 am on 10 Oct 2007

  5. dsandler  

    h/t rod: there’s an impromptu cover art contest since the album has no cover (at the moment).

    comment posted at 1:52 pm on 10 Oct 2007

Add a comment

html help (show)
newer: older: