[17:57] <em> looking for a high-quality Stuff Engineer. must have 10 years experience in Stuff.
Archive for November, 2005
Some of you may already know that in July of last year I had a rather embarrassing (and highly dangerous) parking mishap. I scrupulously avoided posting it back then, but I think enough time has passed that I can share the story with you all.
Plus, it’s an excuse to try out my shiny new (old) scanner ($22 on CL).
Please enjoy: “my new parking technique is unstoppable” (originally drawn & inked in my large sketchbook on July 27, 2004).
I pushed out a new FeedTree release at about 2:30 this morning. The biggest new feature is a shiny graphical app, because the biggest complaint I received about the last release was the arcane command-line interface. Downloads available for Mac, Windows, and any other platform that runs Swing applications. (The command-line ftproxy is still available, too.)
Update 11/18: Version 0.6.1 is now out, and it’s even better—oh point one better!
Kevin Burton: Nasty New Trackback Spam. The main technique in this case exploits the fact that TypePad allows HTML in a place where it shouldn’t (an easy fix), but this caught my eye:
3. In the post URL they encode your permalink’s URL so that automated backlink trackers fail since now your URL appears on their site.
This might sound a bit confusing so I’ll show an example.
The trackback they submitted was:
http://foocom/foo.php?www.feedblog.org/2005/08/msn_filter_even.html
Then when you load this URL they automatically create a link to:
http://www.feedblog.org/2005/08/msn_filter_even.html
This is the first attack I’m aware of that specifically attempts to thwart backlink checkers like the Trackback Validator I helped with this past summer. When we started the project, we predicted that trackback spammers would either give up and go home (ha!) or they’d continue with the arms race and develop some kind of dynamic spam page in response.
There are a couple of reasons why I think this means that the spammers have essentially lost:
- The spammers now need a stable URL on a server that can (potentially) serve a lot of hits. It’s a slightly greater investment, and any time we can create some financial burden on spammers, it’s a tiny win.
- More importantly, the URL used in the spam contains a valid backlink. By the metric we described when we released the Validator, this is no longer considered “spam”. Since PageRank is (currently) strictly additive, this means that the spammer can only be increasing your PageRank (and of course you’re doing nothing for his, because you used nofollow, right?). The spam is essentially harmless (and, in practice, difficult for a human to distinguish from a legitimate Trackback).
In a sense, these are the central goals of any anti-spam effort: to increase the costs to spammers, and to decrease the costs (in terms of time, PageRank, money, etc.) to recipients.
02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
Dear automobile enthusiasts: My Scion (2004 xA, related entries) has started emitting a ticking/clicking sound from its front right wheel. The sound, which really reminds me of a turn signal or of a baseball card stuck between the spokes of a bike wheel, seems to occur in a march: CHIK-chik-CHIK-chik.
It is timed to the speed of the car (not the speed of the engine); I had thought it occurred more than once per tire revolution, but a quick calculation (based on a rough measurement of 4 clicks/sec at 10 mph) proves that it occurs just about once per go-round. No correlation with turning or anything, either.
It’s not so loud that I can hear the sound with the windows up, but with the front passenger’s window down, it’s pretty clearly audible (moreso when I pass a solid object on the right which will reflect the sound). I’ve checked as best I can for stones in the tread and can’t find any. No, I don’t have fancy hubs or spinners or anything; this is the standard, el-cheapo plastic hubcap (which appears securely fastened, if slightly curb-scraped).
Thoughts?




